#view.description##view.showall#


Rodriguez Offers Apology, but Is It the Whole Truth?

But was he upset about his image being sullied once again, or was he chastened by being caught cheating? It was hard to tell.

At least Rodriguez told a version of what might have been an approximate slice of truth. In a way, that seemed like an improvement over how some other stars have discussed what will forever be known as The Steroid Years. But ultimately, what A-Rod did was not exactly the same thing as revealing the truth.

He said, “and to be quite honest, I don’t know exactly what substance I was guilty of using,” which sounds a trifle unbelievable, given the obsessive attention he and other wealthy professionals pay to their bodies.

He talked in vague terms about the “culture” of the times and claimed that he might have tripped up over something he could have bought in a drug store.

But Primobolan, an anabolic steroid, which showed up in his 2003 test, is not sold legally in the United States. Rodriguez assured Peter Gammons of ESPN that it really didn’t matter who supplied him, or how.

In more than half an hour of a one-on-one interview, Rodriguez seemed both overpackaged and underprepared, his body twitching with emotion. He did not have much to volunteer other than that he took something in 2001 and 2002 but he quit in spring training of 2003 after he injured his neck.

His basic reason for trying stuff was that it was a “loosey-goosey” era. In other words, everybody else was doing it, and he was young and stupid. Now he seems to be banking on Mark Teixeira and C. C. Sabathia and his old buddy Derek Jeter to help win a World Series and get him into the Hall of Fame.

Complaining that Sports Illustrated, which broke the story over the weekend, had been stalking him, and denying José Canseco’s old claim of introducing Rodriguez to a Miami steroid dealer, Rodriguez once again made himself sound like a victim of circumstance.

When Gammons alluded to a recent divorce, mercifully stopping short of referring to the dalliance with Madonna, Rodriguez passively said he had just gone through a rough 15 months.

His limited confession tried to imitate the nonspecific apology Jason Giambi had used to calm down the mob. Seen in its entirety, however, the apology by Rodriguez sounded trite. But consider the source.

In a way, Rodriguez did surpass Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire. With 553 home runs, Rodriguez has been the great hope of baseball to pass Bonds, who holds the career record with 762 homers. McGwire was openly using a steroid substitute in 1998, and was accused of using the real stuff. Bonds apparently was so jealous that he looked up the seedy Balco laboratory, an involvement that has led to Bonds’ indictment by a San Francisco grand jury. McGwire’s face turned red and he seemed to shrink in front of a Congressional panel in 2005 as he refused to discuss whether he had used performance-enhancing drugs.

The industry cannot penalize Rodriguez for the 2003 positive test because the players association and Major League Baseball managed to delay serious penalties until later. Rodriguez was apparently one of 104 players who tested positive, a result that should have remained confidential and been destroyed.

In the same report on Saturday, SI.com said that Gene Orza, the chief operating officer of the players union, had notified Rodriguez in September 2004 that he was about to be tested. Orza denied it Monday. If anything like that happened, it would be a much more serious breach of confidence than anything a player did.

This is never going to go away for Rodriguez, who heads into spring training with the title A-Fraud pasted across his broad back, courtesy of an unnecessary book by his former manager, Joe Torre.

Yankee fans don’t particularly care for A-Rod because he has never won them a World Series, and in the Bronx what else is there? And before he ever joined the Yankees in 2004, Rodriguez was set apart for sniping at Jeter, who has never forgotten or forgiven. A-Rod brought it upon himself, just as he brought this scandal on himself.

Baseball will never be able to quantify what Bonds and McGwire and Rodriguez — or pitchers like Roger Clemens — owe to their use of illegal drugs. What’s the formula? An arbitrary 10 percent of home runs or strikeouts? They are great players, with or without cheating, but ultimately they have to pass the schlubby Greek chorus of baseball writers who vote for the Hall of Fame.

Some people will say the Yankees should just cut him loose, but nobody is taking up his 10-year contract of $275 million, which runs nine more years. The fans will boo in New York and elsewhere, and baseball will continue to sell tickets.

When the first quotes of his confession surfaced in midafternoon, it sounded as if Rodriguez really understood he had done something wrong. In the full interview, the more he talked, the more disassociated he sounded. He still doesn’t get it.
 





Punches Fly At Rocklin Basketball Tournament

By: Laura Mathison
FOX40 News
lmathison@tribune.com

February 9, 2009

ROCKLIN - A fight broke out at a Rocklin basketball tournament and now a coach is accused of punching a young player.

The incident unfolded Sunday afternoon at the Hardwood Palace Sports Facility.  Authorities believe it all started when a group of parents on one side started to argue with coaches on the other side.  That is when the kids got involved.

50 adults and players were involved in the brawl.  Witnesses say at one point one of the coaches punched a 14-year-old player who was transported to the hospital.  The victim is expected to be okay.

Officers are still trying to piece together how everything happened, but they are getting conflicting stories.

 


In order to reach the full potential of a group, there must be cooperation at all levels- working together in all ways to accomplish the common goal. The get cooperation you must give cooperation.

You are not the only person with good ideas. If you wish to be heard, listen. Always seek to find the best way rather than insisting on having things your own way. This requires cooperation.

Cooperation allows a group of individuals to move forward together, to move in the same direction instead of going in different directions.

Ten strong field horses could not pull an empty baby carriage if they worked independently of each other. Regardless of how much effort the exerted individually,, the carriage wouldn’t budge without their mutual cooperation.

Cooperation- the sharing of ideas, information, creativity, responsibilities and tasks- is a priority of good leadership. The only thing that is not shared is blame. A strong leader accepts blame and gives the credit (when deserved) to others.

A weak leader gives blame and takes credit. Be careful when you, the leader, start taking bows for the accomplishments of your organization. You must derive pride not from the accolades of outsiders, but the efforts and achievements- success- of your team and the accolades it receives.






 


Industriousness? In plain language- you have to work and work hard. There is no substitute for work. None. Worthwhile things come only from real work.

Tiger Woods? Payton Manning? As important as their physical abilities are, they have work to correct and improve their skills. They are legendary for their hard work, their industriousness. And so is anyone else who has achieved personal success and competitive greatness- Michael Jordan.  Jack Nicklaus.  Lance Armstrong.

Businessperson, clergy, doctor, lawyer, plumber, artist, writer, coach or athlete, all share a fundamental trait if they achieve competitive greatness. They work very hard. It is essential and only you know if you’re really giving everything you’ve got.

Grantland Rice understood this when he wrote “How to Be a Champion”:

You wonder how they do it,
You look to see the knack
You watch the foot in action,
Or the shoulder or the back.
But when you spot the answer
Where the higher glamor lurk,
You’ll find in moving higher
Up the laurel-covered spire,
That most of it is practice,
And the rest of it is work.


So, industriousness is the first of the cornerstones in the foundation of the Pyramid of Success. It involves more than just showing up and going through the motions. Many people who tell you they worked all day weren’t actually working very hard at all, certainly not to the fullest extent of their ability.

You can work without being industrious, but you not be industrious without work.






 




Here's Coach Wooden on the number 2 block in the "Pyramid of Success":

You may question the role of Friendship in the context of leadership. Is it wise for a leader to become ‘friends’ with those under his or her leadership? Will friendship hinder correct decision making when hard choices are called for?

I believe there are various kinds of degrees of friendship based on a wide range of appreciations. We may have an acquaintance with whom we are friendly because of a shared interest in politics or sports another whose humor we enjoy, some may be golfing, bowling or fishing buddies; perhaps we have an old friend from high school whom we haven’t seen in 20 years. All are friends in different and good ways- but not in the way I mean friendship

The two qualities of friendship so important for a leader to possess and instill in team members are respect and camaraderie. To me these are the most noteworthy characteristics of true friendship.

The two qualities of friendship so important for a leader to possess and instill in team members are respect and camaraderie. To me these are the most noteworthy characteristics of true friendship as it relates to leadership.

Camaraderie is a spirit of goodwill that exists between individuals and members of a group- comrades-in-arms. Think of how much you’ll give when asked to do so by someone you respect and with whom you share camaraderie. You’ll give plenty- everything you’ve got. Those under your leadership will do the same if you show them this part of yourself.

This, I sought and valued these two particular qualities of friendship in my relationship with the individuals on the UCLA men’s basketball team .I did not seek their affection nor wish to become ‘buddies’. Mutual respect and camaraderie strengthen. Affection, in fact, may weaken it by causing you to play favorites.

When camaraderie and respect exist you will find the makings of a formidable organization or a key component to building an unbreakable team.









 


Powered by Inserit
 
 
© 2007 Character Combine contact 916.856.5651 All rights reserved. Web site development by Hydrate Studios